Treatment of Failure of Macular Hole Closure due to Post-Vitrectomy Macular Edema Using Sub-Tenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection: A Case Report.

Introduction: Post-vitrectomy cystoid macular edema (CME) can lead to failure of macular hole (MH) closure. We report 2 cases of failure of MH closure due to post-vitrectomy CME, which were successfully treated using sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injection. Case Presentations: Case 1 involved a 72-year-old male patient with a Gass Stage 3 MH in the right eye. He underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), internal limiting membrane translocation, and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas injection with cataract surgery in his right eye. The MH did not close postoperatively; further, CME developed at the edge of the MH. Accordingly, the patient underwent an STTA injection. Approximately 2 weeks after the STTA injection, the CME disappeared and the MH closed, which has remained closed 1 year after PPV. Case 2 involved a 78-year-old female patient with Gass Stage 3 MH in the left eye. The patient underwent the same surgical procedure as that performed in case 1. Further, she presented with failure of MH closure caused by CME; therefore, an STTA injection was performed. Approximately 6 weeks after STTA injection, the CME disappeared and the MH closed; further, there was maintained improvement of best-corrected visual acuity for 6 months. Conclusions: STTA injection could be considered before reoperation in cases involving failure of MH closure due to postoperative CME.

Successful Management of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy with a Large Macular Hole Using Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique.

Introduction: This case report aims to shed light on a rare presentation of familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) co-existing with a large full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) in a 16-year-old male and discuss its successful surgical management, thereby adding to the limited existing knowledge on this topic. Case Presentation: Over an 8-month period, the patient had experienced progressively worsening visual blurring and distortion in his left eye. Following a comprehensive examination, diagnosis confirmed FEVR and an accompanying large FTMH. It was hypothesized that this unusual manifestation resulted from the tractional forces exerted by a thick posterior vitreous membrane and a thin epiretinal membrane - a distinctive attribute of FEVR. The patient underwent surgical intervention, which included pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, gas tamponade, and the inverted ILM flap technique. Postoperative outcomes were favorable, with the FTMH successfully closed and substantial improvement observed in the patient's visual acuity at the 3-month follow-up visit. Conclusion: This case report highlights a rare association of FEVR with FTMH, thereby broadening our understanding of potential complications in patients with FEVR. The successful surgical intervention reinforces the utility of the PPV and the inverted ILM flap technique in managing such complications. It underscores the need for clinicians to maintain vigilance for such atypical manifestations in FEVR patients.

Microperimetry-guided inverted internal limiting membrane flap site selection to preserve retinal sensitivity in macular hole with glaucoma.

Purpose: In cases of macular hole (MH) that is difficult to close, including large, chronic, or highly myopic cases, the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique is often preferred and yields favorable surgical outcomes as compared to those yielded by conventional ILM peeling. However, no consensus exists on the optimal location and area for peeling and inverting the ILM, since multiple alternative methods have been reported alongside the original method. Several adverse effects associated with ILM peeling have been documented, including mechanical impairment of the retinal nerve fiber layer and decreased retinal sensitivity. Particularly, when glaucoma is concomitant, the retinal nerve fiber layer is fragile, raising concerns about a decrease in retinal sensitivity. Consequently, in patients with large MH alongside glaucoma, the goal is to select a procedure that maximizes the closure rate of the MH while minimizing any negative impact on glaucomatous visual field impairment. However, a technique for this purpose has not yet been validated. Observations: A woman in her 60s presented with visual impairment (20/50), metamorphopsia, and central scotoma of unknown onset in the right eye. A full-thickness MH accompanied by epiretinal proliferation (EP) was identified, with a minimum diameter of 506 µm. Although a retinal nerve fiber layer defect was not evident on ophthalmoscopy, thinning of the ganglion cell complex (GCC), extending from the superotemporal aspect of the optic disc, was observed on optical coherence tomography. Both microperimetry and static visual field testing revealed reduced retinal sensitivity in the thinned GCC areas. A pars plana vitrectomy combined with cataract surgery was performed to address her condition. The EP was embedded into the foveal cavity. On the basis of the microperimetry results, the ILM within the absolute scotoma region was peeled on the superotemporal side of the fovea to create a flap, which was then placed over the MH. A gas tamponade was applied, and the patient was maintained in a prone position postoperatively. The MH was successfully closed after the surgery, resulting in visual improvement (20/25). No decline in retinal sensitivity after the surgery was observed. Conclusions and importance: Determining the location and area of the inverted ILM flap on the basis of microperimetry results is a promising patient-tailored strategy for treating MH concomitant with glaucoma while preventing further ILM peeling-associated reduction in the retinal sensitivity.

Surgical Management of Full-Thickness Macular Holes Spontaneously Arising From Lamellar Macular Holes.

Introduction: To review the literature regarding surgical management of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) spontaneously arising from lamellar MHs (LMHs). Methods: The literature on surgically managed FTMHs arising from LMHs was reviewed via Ovid MEDLINE and Embase through June 5, 2022. Results: Seventy-six eyes from 16 articles were included. Forty eyes had internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, 32 inverted ILM flap techniques, and 4 an unclear surgical technique. The FTMH closure rate was not significantly different between ILM peeling (34/40 [85%]) and the inverted ILM flap techniques (28/32 [88%]) (P = .761). The mean (±SD) logMAR visual acuity improved from 0.64 ± 0.46 to 0.25 ± 0.22 (Snellen 20/87 to 20/36) with ILM peeling (n = 30); similar data were not available for inverted ILM flap techniques. Conclusions: Foveal tissue loss, flat hole edges, and limited retinal hydration may result in inverted ILM flap techniques having outcomes similar to those of ILM peeling in repairing FTMHs from LMHs. Future studies are needed to compare techniques.

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for <400 µm Macular Hole: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique was initially developed for the closure of large macular holes (MHs). However, its efficacy in treating small holes has been a matter of debate. This study aimed to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of vitrectomy (PPV) combined with the inverted ILM flap and ILM peeling in cases of small and medium-sized MHs. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted by searching the relevant literature in databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search included articles published from the inception of the databases up until January 2023. The inclusion criteria limited the studies to only experimental-based research. The heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis were performed to ensure the statistical power and reliability of the analysis. RESULTS: Five studies, including two non-randomized concurrent control trials and three non-randomized concurrent control trials, comprising a total of 269 eyes, were analysed. The results showed no significant difference in the MH closure rate between the two groups (odds ratio (OR) = 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.04-1.96, p = 0.33). Furthermore, there were no significant differences observed in visual acuity, external limiting membrane (ELM), and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity at 3 months (ELM OR = 0.88, EZ OR = 0.85) or 12 months (ELM OR = 0.96, EZ OR = 1.39) post-operation between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The surgical repair of MHs smaller than 400 µm with ILM flap seems to be similar in visual acuity improvement and anatomical recovery compared to the traditional technique.

Comparison of anatomical and functional outcomes of different surgical techniques in myopic macular hole without retinal detachment.

AIM: To define the anatomic and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, inverted ILM flap and free ILM patch graft technique for the treatment of myopic macular hole (MH) without retinal detachment. METHODS: Sixty-four eyes of 64 patients who underwent PPV for myopic MH were included. Group 1 consists of patients underwent ILM peeling (n=26), and Groups 2 and 3 consists of patient underwent free ILM patch graft (n=20) and inverted ILM flap procedure (n=18) respectively. Outcomes following surgery were MH closure and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR at 6mo. RESULTS: Closure of MH was obtained in 20 eyes (76.9%) of the Group 1, in 16 eyes (80%) of the Group 2 and in 16 eyes (88.9%) of the Group 3. The mean preoperative and postoperative BCVA was 1.60±0.53 logMAR and 1.27±0.58 logMAR, respectively (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative BCVA and anatomical closure rates in the three groups. Although the anatomical closure rate did not differ significantly in the groups, closure of MH tended to be better in the inverted ILM flap technique group at 6mo. CONCLUSION: Different surgical techniques may provide favorable visual and anatomical results for myopic MH surgery. ILM flap techniques offer higher closure rates compared to ILM peeling technique. However, in terms of visual outcomes, the study reveals no difference in three surgical techniques.

Temporal and double inverted internal limiting membrane flap for bilateral choroidal ruptures complicated by bilateral macular holes.

Choroidal ruptures occur in 5% to 10% closed-globe injuries with wide variation in visual prognosis, which depending on the visual acuity at presentation, the location of the rupture, and other associated ocular injuries. We reported a case of bilateral traumatic choroidal rupture with a large macular hole. We performed surgery in the right eye of microincisional vitrectomy, temporally inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap, and C3F8 tamponade; then microincisional vitrectomy, fibrotic scar removal, double inverted ILM flap, and C3F8 tamponade in the left eye. After surgery, she achieved both good anatomical and visual acuity improvement in the right eye, but limited visual acuity improvement in the left eye due to subfoveal choroidal scar formation.

Characteristics and outcomes of full-thickness macular holes created during vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical features, management, and prognosis of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) inadvertently created during vitrectomy for eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and fibrovascular proliferation (FVP). METHODS: Eyes with PDR and FVP that had intraoperatively created FTMHs were retrospectively collected as the study group, and age- and sex-matched subjects with PDR and FVP who did not have intraoperative FTMHs were selected as the control group. Fundus abnormalities, optical coherence tomography (OCT) features, and anatomical and functional outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients (5 male and 6 female) were identified as the study group. Follow-up duration was 36.8 ± 47.2 months. FTMHs were managed by ILM peeling or the inverted ILM flap technique. Anatomical success and MH closure were achieved in 100% of eyes in the study group. In comparison to the control group, the study group had a higher proportion of condensed prefoveal tissue (63.6% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.028), and a higher ratio of silicone oil tamponade (63.6% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.014), whereas there were no differences in preoperative and final BCVA, and the severity, activity, and locations of FVP between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Condensed prefoveal tissue was a risk factor of FTMHs created during operation for eyes with PDR and FVP. The ILM peeling or the inverted ILM flap technique may be beneficial for the treatment with favorable anatomical and functional outcomes.

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Insertion Technique for Large Macular Holes: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSES: This meta-analysis aimed to compare and evaluate the morphological and functional outcomes between the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM insertion techniques in the treatment of large macular holes (MHs). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies comparing the two techniques for the treatment of large MHs. The primary outcome measures included the MH closure rate, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), MH closure patterns, and external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) recovery. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Two randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. The MH closure rate did not significantly differ between the two groups (P = .93). Postoperative BCVA was not significantly different between the two groups at 3 months (P = .20) or 6 months (P = .51). ELM and EZ recovery were also similar between the two groups. However, the results for postoperative BCVA and outer retinal structure recovery tended to favor the ILM flap group based on the forest plot. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the U-shape (P = .26), V-shape (P = .65), and W-shape closure types (P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis provides evidence that the MH closure rate and visual function outcomes are similar between the ILM flap and ILM insertion techniques in large MHs. However, based on the forest plot, postoperative BCVA and outer retinal layer reconstruction tended to favor the ILM flap technique. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm the superiority of the ILM flap to the ILM insertion technique.

Flap-Related Complications Following Temporal Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap for Macular Hole Repair.

Here we report three cases of flap-related complications following temporal inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique for the repair of macular holes (MH). The first case showed a flap closure pattern in which the MH completely closed at 2 months spontaneously. The second case showed early anatomical and functional improvement provided by an immediate closure of the MH but developed flap contracture and nasally located epiretinal membrane (ERM) at postoperative 18 months. There was no functional deterioration, thus no further intervention was required. In the third case, early postoperative flap dislocation was observed and an additional surgery to reposition the flap was needed. The flap closure pattern observed with inverted ILM flap techniques may represent the ongoing healing process of large MHs and may be related to delayed spontaneous anatomical closure. ILM flap contracture and ERM formation may be a harmless long-term complication. Dislocation of the ILM flap is an unexpected early postoperative complication that may necessitate a second surgery for flap repositioning.

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique Combined with Air Tamponade in the Treatment of Macular Holes in High Myopia.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the anatomical and visual outcomes after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or ILM flap insertion in highly myopic macular holes (HMMHs) and try to compare these two surgical techniques in large HMMHs. METHODS: This is a retrospective, consecutive series study of patients with HMMH undergone vitrectomy from September 2016 to January 2021. We observed the outcomes of the HMMHs with ILM peeling and ILM flap insertion, respectively. Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to analyze the relationship between the minimum linear diameter (MLD) of macular hole and the initial closure rate in ILM peeling group. Finally, we compared the surgical outcomes between these two surgical techniques in large HMMHs. RESULTS: There were 69 HMMHs using ILM peeling with a mean MLD of 423.55 ± 190.99 µm and 33 HMMHs using ILM flap insertion with a mean MLD of 600.79 ± 187.85 µm. The initial type I closure rate was 86.9% (60/69) and 81.8% (27/33), respectively. MLD had a good correlation with the initial closure rate in HMMHs with ILM peeling (p = 0.046). The large HMMH (MLD >461.5 µm obtained by ROC curve) was present in 26 eyes with each surgical technique, and there was no significant difference of baseline characteristics between them. In large HMMHs, the initial closure rate of ILM peeling was 73.0% and that of ILM flap insertion was 84.6% (p = 0.499). Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001), and the BCVA at last follow-up was better in closed large HMMHs with ILM peeling (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: In HMMHs with ILM peeling, the initial closure rate was decreased when MLD >461.5 µm. ILM peeling may obtain better functional prognosis in eyes with closed large macular holes compared with ILM flap insertion.

Comparative study of conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap for large macular hole treatment.

Purpose: To compare the anatomical, morphological, and functional outcomes of the conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus temporal inverted ILM flap technique for large full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs). Methods: Sixty eyes of 60 patients with a minimum base diameter >600 µm were included in this retrospective interventional study. Patients were divided into conventional ILM peeling (Group 1) and temporal inverted ILM flap (Group 2) groups. The hole closure rate, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ellipsoid zone (EZ), and external limiting membrane (ELM) defects were analyzed at baseline and 6 months after surgery. Results: Hole closure was achieved in 24/32 (75.0%) cases of Group 1 and 27/28 (96.4%) cases of Group 2 (P = 0.029). The mean BCVA (logMAR) changed from 1.23 ± 0.47 to 0.70 ± 0.29 logMAR in Group 1 and from 1.03 ± 0.36 to 0.49 ± 0.24 logMAR in Group 2 at 6 months (P < 0.001 in both cases). U-shaped closure was observed in 5 (15.6%) eyes in Group 1 and 19 (67.9%) eyes in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The total restoration rates of ELM and EZ were significantly higher in the temporal inverted ILM flap group (P = 0.002, P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The study results suggested that the FTMH closure rate, recovery of the outer retinal layers, and, consequently, the post-operative BCVA were better with the temporal inverted ILM flap technique than with the conventional ILM peeling for larger than 600 µm macular holes.

Epiretinal proliferation embedding combined with internal limiting membrane flap inversion for secondary macular hole: Two case reports.

Purpose: We describe the cases of two patients for whom we performed an epiretinal proliferation (EP) embedding technique combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap inversion for a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) with EP. Observations: Patient 1 was a 69-year-old Japanese man with decreased vision in his left eye (20/40). He underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) twice for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation in his left eye. B-scan optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging revealed FTMH and EP on the surface of a macular hole (MH). We performed a vitrectomy, EP embedding, and ILM inversion (fill). Patient 2 was a 73-year-old Japanese man with decreased vision in his right eye (20/32). He underwent PPV for vitreous hemorrhage and proliferative diabetic retinopathy in his right eye. B-scan OCT imaging revealed FTMH and EP on the surface of an MH. We performed a vitrectomy, EP embedding, and ILM inversion (cover). Six months post-surgery, the FTMH in both patients had closed completely, and each patient's foveal contour and visual acuity (20/20) had improved. Conclusions and importance: EP embedding combined with ILM flap inversion may be effective for treating secondary MHs with EP.

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for treating macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy(PPV)combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in the treatment of macular hole retinal detachment(MHRD)in high myopia.METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was conducted. A total of 63 patients(64 eyes)with high myopia and MHRD who treated at our hospital from October 2017 to October 2021 were selected as research subjects. They were divided into two groups according to different surgery, with 34 cases(35 eyes)who received PPV combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in group A, and 29 cases(29 eyes)received PPV combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in group B. The patients were followed up for 6mo. The two groups were compared in terms of the hole closure rate, the reduction rate of retinal detachment and best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)before operation and at 1wk, 1, 3 and 6mo after operation, and the postoperative complications were recorded.RESULTS: The hole closure rate within 6mo after operation was significantly higher in group A than in group B(P&#x0026;#x003C;0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the reduction rate of retinal detachment(P&#x0026;#x003E;0.05). The BCVA of the two groups was significantly improved over time after operation(P&#x0026;#x003C;0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA between the two groups before operation and at 1wk, 1, 3 and 6mo after operation(P&#x0026;#x003E;0.05). Complications were observed in the two groups, but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P&#x0026;#x003C;0.05).CONCLUSION: PPV combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique is safe and effective in the treatment of MHRD in high myopia, which can effectively improve the patients' BCVA and the hole closure rate without influence on intraocular pressure.

Visual improvement and regeneration of retinal layers in eyes with small, medium, and large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes treated with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique over a period of 12 months.

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the reduction in defect length of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) in small ([Formula: see text] 250 µm), medium ([Formula: see text] 250 µm), and large ([Formula: see text] 400 µm) full-thickness macular holes (FTMH) treated with inverted internal limiting membrane (I-ILM) flap technique over a follow-up period of 12 months. METHODS: Ninety-one eyes of 87 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. BCVA and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were conducted preoperatively as well as after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The defect length of the ELM and the EZ was measured using the caliper tool at each follow-up time point. RESULTS: BCVA improved significantly in the group of small, medium, and large FTMH over the time of 12 months, whereby the improvement did not depend on FTMH size over 9 months. Only after 12 months, large FTMH showed significantly higher BCVA improvement compared to small and medium FTMH. The closure rate was 100% (91/91). The defect length of ELM and EZ reduced continuously over the period of 12 months. There was a significant correlation between defect length of ELM and EZ with postoperative BCVA. CONCLUSION: The I-ILM flap technique has very good morphological and functional outcomes in small, medium, and large FTMH over a long-time period, indicating that it can be considered as a treatment option in small and medium FTMH. The defect length of ELM and EZ is directly connected to postoperative BCVA.

Secondary Macular Holes Post Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

Purpose: To report incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment outcome of full-thickness macular hole (FTMHs) diagnosed post pars plana vitrectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the demographics, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indication for the primary vitrectomy, time to diagnose the secondary FTMH, optical coherence tomographic (OCT) appearance, and treatment outcome of FTMHs, occurring after vitrectomy performed between January 2019 and December 2020. Results: Six of 523 vitrectomized eyes developed FTMHs, an incidence of 1.1%. There were five females and one male, mean age of 56.5 years (range 37-85). The indication for primary vitrectomy was rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in three eyes, one eye each for sub internal limiting membrane hemorrhage from a ruptured macroaneurysm, vitreous hemorrhage from polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and pre-insertion of Ahmed glaucoma drainage device (GDD). FTMHs occurred within one week to three months after vitrectomy (time from primary vitrectomy to the identification of the secondary MH was a mean of 1.03 months). Mean BCVA in all six MH eyes was log MAR 0.9 (Snellen: 6/54). Anatomical closure was achieved after one surgery in three eyes, two surgeries in 1 eye, after photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the PCV eye, and one patient declined surgery. The mean BCVA in the four surgically closed MH eyes improved marginally from log MAR 0.82 (Snellen: 6/38) to log MAR 0.72 (Snellen: 6/30), mean follow-up 7.6 months. Conclusion: Post-vitrectomy FTMH is rare, and RRD was the commonest indication for initial vitrectomy. We observed that all secondary MHs were closed successfully using the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with limited improvement in vision. The visual outcome of these secondary MHs trails behind that of idiopathic MHs.

Unilateral double optic nerve head pits with foveo-schisis detachment treated by modified internal limiting membrane peeling technique.

A 44-year-old female with a vision of 10/200 in the right eye had double pits in the temporal segment of the optic disc with serous macular detachment. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) confirmed serous retinal detachment, an outer layer hole, and double optic disc pits. The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy with modified ILM flap surgery involving fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling (FSIP) technique with inverted ILM flap tucking with gas tamponade. Post surgery, the communications between perineural and intraretinal spaces were obliterated with flaps of ILM covering the pits, with reduced serous macular detachment and BCVA of 20/120. FSIP with inverted internal limiting membrane flap tuck can be an effective technique to manage rare cases of double ODP-M.

A case of Nd:YAG laser-induced traumatic macular hole with good visual prognosis after vitrectomy with inverted internal limiting membrane technique.

PURPOSE: To report an accidental case of traumatic macular hole caused by Nd:YAG laser in a dermatology clinic. OBSERVATIONS: A 24-year-old woman sustained a laser injury to her right eye while practicing a dermatologic treatment using a Nd:YAG laser without wearing protective goggles. She noticed sudden-onset and progressing visual loss in her right eye and consulted an ophthalmologist 2 days after injury. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of her right eye decreased to 20/133. Fundus examination showed white parafoveal flecks with a central retinal hemorrhage and underlying serous retinal detachment. The retinal sensitivity in this lesion deteriorated. Two weeks later, a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) developed in the affected eye. She was referred to Nagoya City University Hospital where the laser damage described was observed. The BCVA was 20/67. She underwent pars plana vitrectomy performed using the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and gas tamponade. One week postoperatively, the FTMH closed, the BCVA in her right eye improved to 20/50, and the retinal sensitivity in the macular area mostly improved. The BCVA gradually improved and reached 20/25 9 months after the injury. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Protective goggles must be worn when using an Nd:YAG laser in the laboratory or clinical setting. In the unfortunate event of a FTMH, early vitrectomy with an inverted ILM flap technique can be helpful to achieve a good visual prognosis.

PPV combined with internal limiting membrane flap or tamping in the treatment of large basal diameter macular hole / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

@#AIM:To investigate the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy(PPV)combined with inverted internal limiting membrane(ILM)flap and PPV combined with ILM tamping in the treatment of large basal diameter idiopathic macular hole(IMH), and to analyze the correlation between postoperative visual acuity and preoperative parameters. <p>METHODS:This study is a retrospective clinical study. Totally 56 patients(57 eyes)with macular hole bottom diameter greater than 1 000μm, who treated in Joint Shantou International Eye Center from January 2018 to December 2020, were enrolled in this study. Thirty eyes were involved in PPV combined with inverted ILM flap(Group 1)and 27 eyes were involved in PPV combined with ILM tamping(Group 2). The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), the closure of the macular hole, thickness of foveal neurosensory layer and complications were compared between the two groups at 1wk and 1mo after the surgery. Person correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between preoperative parameters and BCVA at 1mo after operation.<p>RESULTS: There was no significant difference in gender, age, eye type, course of disease, preoperative BCVA, postoperative macular hole healing classification, preoperative hole bottom diameter and eye axis between the two groups(P>0.05). The closure rate of macular hole in Group 1 was 97%, of which type 1 closure was 80%. The closure rate of macular hole in Group 2 was 100%, of which type 1 closure was 78%, and there was no significant difference in the closure rate(P=0.99). The postoperative follow-up BCVA of patients in both groups was better than that before operation(all P<0.01). The BCVA of Group 1 was better than Group 2 at 1mo after operation, and the difference was statistically significant(t= -2.20, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in the thickness of foveal neurosensory layer between two groups at 1mo after operation(t=0.407, P=0.69). The BCVA at 1mo after operation was positively correlated with the hole diameter and preoperative BCVA(r=0.435, P=0.004; r=0.440, P=0.001). There was no complication in both groups during and after operation. <p>CONCLUSION:PPV combined with inverted ILM flap and PPV combined with ILM tamping can improve the closure rate of the hole. The long-term visual acuity of PPV combined with inverted ILM flap is better than that of PPV combined with ILM tamping. There is a significant positive correlation between postoperative BCVA and the bottom diameter of the hole and preoperative BCVA. Preoperative bottom diameter can be used as one of the basis for clinical prognosis.

Changes in retinal sensitivity following inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and measure the retinal sensitivity using microperimetry-1 (MP-1) test in patients with large macular hole (MH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients undergoing surgery for idiopathic MHs from January 2016 to October 2019. Only patients having a minimum diameter of idiopathic MH exceeding 500 µm were included in this study. All patients underwent complete preoperative ophthalmologic examinations, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurements. Postoperative OCT and BCVA were evaluated at least 3 months postoperatively. In addition, these patients also received MP-1 pre- and postoperatively for retinal sensitivity measurement. RESULTS: Totally ten patients (ten eyes) were included for analysis. The mean retinal sensitivity within central 12° and 40° was statistically improved after surgery (P < 0.05). The number of absolute or relative scotoma (stimulus values ≤4 dB) within central 4° showed a significant reduction postoperatively. There was also a significant increase in visual acuity postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Patients with large MH have a great successful rate by receiving inverted ILM flap technique. In our study, all MHs of ten eyes were closed postoperatively. The results also demonstrated that ILM flap technique improves both the functional and anatomic outcomes.